Maternal Infant Health Outreach Worker (MIHOW)® Meets HHS Criteria

Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2022

Effects shown in research

Maternal health

Findings rated high

Maternal Infant Health Outreach Worker (MIHOW)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance

Average number of prenatal visits during pregnancy

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

Prenatal period

MIHOW vs. MEI, Davidson County, Tennessee, 2014-2016, full sample

177 mothers Unadjusted mean = 9.00 Visits Unadjusted mean = 9.20 Visits Mean difference = -0.20 HomVEE calculated = -0.09

Not statistically significant, p= 0.48

Maternal Infant Health Outreach Worker (MIHOW)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

2 weeks postpartum

MIHOW vs. MEI, Tennessee, 2018-2020, full sample

109 mothers Unadjusted mean = 1.26 Unadjusted mean = 1.26 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.01

Not statistically significant, p= 0.95

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Author-reported effect size was calculated with Cohen's D.

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

35 weeks gestation

MIHOW vs. MEI, Tennessee, 2018-2020, full sample

102 mothers Unadjusted mean = 1.44 Unadjusted mean = 1.47 Mean difference = -0.02 Study reported = -0.06

Not statistically significant, p= 0.75

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Author-reported effect size was calculated with Cohen's D.

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

9 months postpartum

MIHOW vs. MEI, Tennessee, 2018-2020, full sample

109 mothers Unadjusted mean = 1.20 Unadjusted mean = 1.43 Mean difference = -0.23 Study reported = -0.56

Statistically significant, p <.01

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Author-reported effect size was calculated with Cohen's D.

Parenting Stress Index 4 (PSI): Total stress score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

12 months postpartum

MIHOW vs. MEI, Tennessee, 2018-2020, full sample

109 mothers Unadjusted mean = 67.00 Unadjusted mean = 79.40 Mean difference = -12.40 Study reported = -0.77

Statistically significant, p <.01

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Author-reported effect size was calculated with Cohen's D.

Parenting Stress Index 4 (PSI): Total stress score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

15 months postpartum

MIHOW vs. MEI, Tennessee, 2018-2020, full sample

109 mothers Unadjusted mean = 59.10 Unadjusted mean = 77.10 Mean difference = -18.00 Study reported = -1.19

Statistically significant, p <.01

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Author-reported effect size was calculated with Cohen's D.

Parenting Stress Index 4 (PSI): Total stress score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

2 months postpartum

MIHOW vs. MEI, Tennessee, 2018-2020, full sample

109 mothers Unadjusted mean = 79.80 Unadjusted mean = 76.90 Mean difference = 2.90 Study reported = 0.14

Not statistically significant, p = 0.43

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Author-reported effect size was calculated with Cohen's D.

Parenting Stress Index 4 (PSI): Total stress score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

2 weeks postpartum

MIHOW vs. MEI, Tennessee, 2018-2020, full sample

109 mothers Unadjusted mean = 75.70 Unadjusted mean = 77.70 Mean difference = -2.00 HomVEE calculated = -0.09

Not statistically significant, p= 0.64

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Parenting Stress Index 4 (PSI): Total stress score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months postpartum

MIHOW vs. MEI, Tennessee, 2018-2020, full sample

109 mothers Unadjusted mean = 75.30 Unadjusted mean = 75.30 Mean difference = 0.00 Study reported = 0.00

Not statistically significant, p = 1.00

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Author-reported effect size was calculated with Cohen's D.

Parenting Stress Index 4 (PSI): Total stress score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

9 months postpartum

MIHOW vs. MEI, Tennessee, 2018-2020, full sample

108 mothers Unadjusted mean = 72.20 Unadjusted mean = 78.50 Mean difference = -6.30 Study reported = -0.35

Statistically significant, p = 0.04

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Submitted by nwu on

Statistical significance is based on HomVEE calculations.

Author-reported effect size was calculated with Cohen's D.

Maternal Infant Health Outreach Worker (MIHOW)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

2 months postpartum

MIHOW vs. MEI, Davidson County, Tennessee, 2014-2016, full sample

176 mothers Unadjusted median = 0.00 Unadjusted median = 3.00 Median difference = -3.00 Study reported = -1.08

Statistically significant, p <.01

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Author-reported effect size was calculated with Cohen’s D.

Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

2 weeks postpartum

MIHOW vs. MEI, Davidson County, Tennessee, 2014-2016, full sample

177 mothers Unadjusted median = 0.00 Unadjusted median = 5.00 Median difference = -5.00 Study reported = -1.41

Statistically significant, p <.01

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Author-reported effect size was calculated with Cohen’s D.

Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months postpartum

MIHOW vs. MEI, Davidson County, Tennessee, 2014-2016, full sample

178 mothers Unadjusted median = 0.00 Unadjusted median = 0.00 Median difference = 0.00 Study reported = -0.76

Statistically significant, p <.01

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Author-reported effect size was calculated with Cohen’s D.

Parenting Stress Index 4 (PSI): Total stress score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

2 months postpartum

MIHOW vs. MEI, Davidson County, Tennessee, 2014-2016, full sample

176 mothers Unadjusted median = 74.00 Unadjusted median = 76.00 Median difference = -2.00 Study reported = -0.46

Statistically significant, p= 0.00

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Author-reported effect size was calculated with Cohen’s D.

Parenting Stress Index 4 (PSI): Total stress score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

2 weeks postpartum

MIHOW vs. MEI, Davidson County, Tennessee, 2014-2016, full sample

177 mothers Unadjusted median = 74.00 Unadjusted median = 76.00 Median difference = -2.00 Study reported = -0.45

Statistically significant, p= 0.00

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Author-reported effect size was calculated with Cohen’s D.

Parenting Stress Index 4 (PSI): Total stress score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months postpartum

MIHOW vs. MEI, Davidson County, Tennessee, 2014-2016, full sample

178 mothers Unadjusted median = 74.00 Unadjusted median = 77.00 Median difference = -3.00 Study reported = -0.72

Statistically significant, p <.01

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Author-reported effect size was calculated with Cohen’s D.

Findings rated moderate

Maternal Infant Health Outreach Worker (MIHOW)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Had a postpartum checkup

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

2 months postpartum

MIHOW vs. MEI, Tennessee, 2018-2020, full sample

110 mothers Unadjusted proportion = 0.91 Unadjusted proportion = 0.94 Difference = -0.03 Study reported = 0.23

Not statistically significant, p= 0.56

Author-reported effect size was calculated with Cohen's D.

Had a postpartum checkup

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

6 months postpartum

MIHOW vs. MEI, Tennessee, 2018-2020, full sample

110 mothers Unadjusted proportion = 1.00 Unadjusted proportion = 0.96 Difference = 0.04 Study reported = 0.41

Not statistically significant, p= 0.09

Author-reported effect size was calculated with Cohen's D.

View Revisions